註二： 《印度斯坦時報》一篇文章 Letters show Nehru didn’t endorse British-era treaty with China on Sikkim border，在引用尼赫魯原文時，用雙引號 “This clearly refers to northern Sikkim and not to the tri-junction which needed to be discussed with Bhutan and Sikkim and which is today the contentious area. And once more, let us not forget that the 1890 Treaty was an unequal treaty as Tibet, Sikkim and Bhutan were not involved”，這表示這段文字是尼赫魯的原文。然而筆者對比過原文，確認這不是原信件的内容，很可能只是該文章作者的詮釋。這種把詮釋作爲原文的做法顯然是錯誤的。現在不知道這是故意還是失誤，但這段話已經被廣泛轉載了，引起的混淆必須澄清。

註三： K. Warikoo, Himalayan Frontiers of India, Routledge (2009), p. 149-155. Bruce A. Elleman et al, Beijing’s Power and China’s Borders, M.E.Sharpe (2013), p29-30.