评论｜为气候危机打官司：各国法院成为全球运动新战场

[注2] Kim Bouwer, The Unsexy Future of Climate Change Litigation, Journal of Environmental Law, Volume 30, Issue 3, November 2018, Pages 483–506, https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy017

[注3] 例如一份针对美国历年案例的研究，就分析气候相关的健康影响作为诉讼理据的作用： McCormick S, Simmens SJ, Glicksman R, Paddock L, Kim D, Whited B. The Role of Health in Climate Litigation. Am J Public Health. 2018 Apr;108(S2):S104-S108. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304206. PMID: 29698089; PMCID: PMC5922204.

[注4] 有关气候诉讼个案的实证失缺分析，详见 Stuart-Smith, R.F., Otto, F.E.L., Saad, A.I. et al. Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 651–655 (2021).